Maybe I should change the name of this blog to," Execute Anyone Who Molests A Child Under X Age." What age is X? I'm not sure but just saw this new article at America's Most Wanted.
http://www.amw.com/fugitives/case.cfm?id=41033
It seems there are multiple people molesting VERY young children. In this case AMW describes the victim as "an infant". This makes me sick and angry. No current method of execution offered in the US would do this guy justice. Please post your comments for suggested methods of execution for people molesting infants.
I'll start with-hot needle in the eye plus razor blade slits to webbing between fingers and toes until death.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
Clearly, you see child molestation as being an act of the most intense hatred for children; some sort of quasidemonic defilement.
You are obviously attributing hideously evil motivations to the molster.
But what if this is not the case?
What if the molester is sick, rather than evil?
What if the molester is stuck with a mental disorder of being attracted exclusively to children that is putting him under enormous pressure to get sexual with them, and finds it too hard to control himself?
How would you feel, if you were strongly sexually attracted to women, but told you could never have any sexual contact with any of them - or else be executed?
Of course, there are different types of molesters. Some molest because they can't control their powerful sexual urges well enough, others molest because they can control themselves but won't.
I was molested myself, and while I didn't enjoy it, I haven't been traumatized by it.
There are, also, other types of child abuse other than sexual, which have extremely damaging consequences.
It's wrong to punish molesters who are unwell, such molesters need treatment.
No I could care less wether the molester hates children or is "sick" I am suggesting death not as a way to rehabiliate but a final punishment to remove the threat to other children. Notice the name of the blog. I am suggesting that if someone is convicted twice of molesting children they are beyond rehabilitation. Your question.."How would you feel.." isn't asking the right question. I'm talking about pople who not only have these feelings and repeatedly act on them knowing they are against the law not to mention disgusting and evil. My answer is I feel like they should die. I have a flaw of worrying too much about money so according to your logic I should be forgiven for robbing a bank?
Robbing banks will have to remain illegal, as will child molestation. However, I would be much more leniant on bank robbers who were from a poverty-stricken background because I'd feel they would have more justification than well-off bank robbers for grabbing money that's not theirs.
Maybe that's your opinion and you won't change it, though, I would prefer to see other pedophiles executed instead, for example those who try to legalise pedophilia like Steering Committee members of NAMBLA, and probably their general membership too. I put people who run so-called "boylove" boards on the internet in the same category, I'd prefer to see them as candidates for execution than repeat molesters.
I think a repeat molester deserves to die for the harm he's caused those multiple children and to prevent him from causing more. How can you equate that crime with membership?
If you start to decide punishment based on the background of the criminal you open each case up to grey areas and that's how people slip through the cracks. My whole point with this blog is to remove the grey area.
But don't get me wrong NAMBLA members should die if they act out their perverted views.
Post a Comment